Plain
Seneca — The Senator

Human nature doesn't want to hurt others. So anger can't be part of human nature, since anger wants to hurt people. Let me also use Plato's argument here — why not borrow from others when they support our point? Plato says: "A good person doesn't hurt anyone. Only punishment hurts people. So punishment doesn't fit with being a good person. And since punishment and anger go together, anger doesn't fit either. If a good person takes no pleasure in punishment, then he won't enjoy the feeling that makes punishment pleasurable. Therefore, anger isn't natural to humans."

On Anger, Book 1, Section 6 Book 1 · 18 of 69
Human Nature Doing The Right Thing
Seneca — The Senator Original

Man’s nature is not, therefore, desirous of inflicting punishment; neither, therefore, is anger in accordance with man’s nature, because that is desirous of inflicting punishment. I will also adduce Plato’s argument—for what harm is there in using other men’s arguments, so far as they are on our side? “A good man,” says he, “does not do any hurt: it is only punishment which hurts. Punishment, therefore, does not accord with a good man: wherefore anger does not do so either, because punishment and anger accord one with another. If a good man takes no pleasure in punishment, he will also take no pleasure in that state of mind to which punishment gives pleasure: consequently anger is not natural to man.”

On Anger, Book 1, Section 6 Book 1 · 18 of 69
Seneca — The Senator

The judge should then use stronger words, still focused on advice and criticism. As a last resort, he should turn to punishments — but keep them light and short. He should only give harsh punishments for the worst crimes. No one should die unless their death actually benefits even them. The judge differs from a doctor in one way: doctors make dying easy for patients they can't save, but the judge drives condemned criminals out of life with shame and disgrace. He doesn't do this because he enjoys seeing people punished — a wise person is far from such cruel brutality. He does it so they serve as a warning to everyone else. Since these criminals were useless while alive, at least the state can benefit from their death.

On Anger, Book 1, Section 6 Book 1 · 17 of 69
Doing The Right Thing Human Nature
Seneca — The Senator Original

He must then pass on to severer language, still confining himself to advising and reprimanding; last of all he must betake himself to punishments, yet still making them slight and temporary. He ought to assign extreme punishments only to extreme crimes, that no one may die unless it be even to the criminal’s own advantage that he should die. He will differ from the physician in one point alone; for whereas physicians render it easy to die for those to whom they cannot grant the boon of life, he will drive the condemned out of life with ignominy and disgrace, not because he takes pleasure in any man’s being punished, for the wise man is far from such inhuman ferocity, but that they may be a warning to all men, and that, since they would not be useful when alive, the state may at any rate profit by their death.

On Anger, Book 1, Section 6 Book 1 · 17 of 69
‹ Previous Next ›

Ancient philosophy, in plain English.

About · Support