What if you moved beyond looking at individual victims of anger to see entire crowds cut down by the sword? What about whole populations slaughtered by soldiers turned loose on them, or entire nations condemned to die together in one great destruction? We act as though these people had either escaped our control or shown contempt for our authority. But why does the crowd get angry at gladiators? Why is it so unfair as to feel wronged when gladiators don't die cheerfully? The crowd thinks it's being disrespected. Through their looks, gestures, and shouting, they transform themselves from mere spectators into enemies.
What, if you were to pass from the consideration of those single men against whom anger has broken out to view whole assemblies cut down by the sword, the people butchered by the soldiery let loose upon it, and whole nations condemned to death in one common ruin . . . . as though by men who either freed themselves from our charge or despised our authority? Why, wherefore is the people angry with gladiators, and so unjust as to think itself wronged if they do not die cheerfully? It thinks itself scorned, and by looks, gestures, and excitement turns itself from a mere spectator into an adversary.