Plain
Seneca — The Senator

It's crazy to get angry at things that can't think. It's just as crazy to get angry at animals. Animals can't do us wrong because they can't make plans to hurt us. We can only call something "wrong" when someone does it on purpose. Animals can hurt us, sure — just like a sword or stone can hurt us. But they can't actually wrong us. Yet some people feel insulted when a horse that's calm with one rider acts up with another. They think the horse chose to be difficult, instead of understanding that some riders are just better at handling horses than others. It's foolish to be angry with animals. It's just as foolish to be angry with children, or with adults who think like children. Before any fair judge, ignorance would excuse these people just as much as innocence would.

On Anger, Book 2, Section 26 Book 2 · 65 of 103
Calm Your Mind Human Nature
Seneca — The Senator Original

Yet as it is the act of a madman to be angry with inanimate objects, so also is it to be angry with dumb animals, which can do us no wrong because they are not able to form a purpose; and we cannot call anything a wrong unless it be done intentionally. They are, therefore, able to hurt us, just as a sword or a stone may do so, but they are not able to do us a wrong. Yet some men think themselves insulted when the same horses which are docile with one rider are restive with another, as though it were through their deliberate choice, and not through habit and cleverness of handling that some horses are more easily managed by some men than by others. And as it is foolish to be angry with them, so it is to be angry with children, and with men who have little more sense than children: for all these sins, before a just judge, ignorance would be as effective an excuse as innocence.

On Anger, Book 2, Section 26 Book 2 · 65 of 103
Seneca — The Senator

"But of course it's their makers who really insult us." I answer that first, we often get angry before we think this through clearly. Second, maybe even the makers have good excuses. One of them might not have been able to make it any better than he did. His poor skill wasn't meant to disrespect you. Another might have done sloppy work without meaning to insult you at all. And finally, what's crazier than taking out your anger at people on their things?

On Anger, Book 2, Section 26 Book 2 · 64 of 103
Calm Your Mind Human Nature
Seneca — The Senator Original

"But of course it is their makers who really affront us." I answer that, in the first place, we often become angry before making this distinction clear in our minds, and secondly, perhaps even the makers might put forward some reasonable excuses: one of them, it may be, could not make them any better than he did, and it is not through any disrespect to you that he was unskilled in his trade: another may have done his work so without any intention of insulting you: and, finally, what can be more crazy than to discharge upon things the ill-feeling which one has accumulated against persons?

On Anger, Book 2, Section 26 Book 2 · 64 of 103
‹ Previous Next ›

Ancient philosophy, in plain English.

About · Support