Plain
Epictetus — The Slave

His goal is simple: while others do their own thing however they want, he stays true to his nature and lives according to it. He just does what's his to do so that others can also live according to their nature. This is what a wise and good person always aims for. Does he want to be a military commander? No. But if he's given that role, his goal is to keep his mind right while doing it. Does he want to get married? No. But if marriage happens, his goal is to stay true to his nature within it. But if he wants his son to behave or his wife to act right, then he's wanting something that belongs to someone else to not belong to them. The whole point of learning is this: figure out what's yours and what belongs to other people.

Discourses, Against the Quarrelsome and Ferocious 341 of 388
Freedom & Control Knowing Yourself
Epictetus — The Slave Original

but that while others are doing their own acts, as they choose, he may nevertheless be in a condition conformable to nature and live in it, only doing what is his own to the end that others also may be in a state conformable to nature. For this is the object always set before him by the wise and good man. Is it to be commander (a prætor) of an army? No; but if it is permitted him, his object is in this matter to maintain his own ruling principle. Is it to marry? No; but if marriage is allowed to him, in this matter his object is to maintain himself in a condition conformable to nature. But if he would have his son not to do wrong or his wife, he would have what belongs to another not to belong to another: and to be instructed is this, to learn what things are a man's own and what belongs to another.

Discourses, Against the Quarrelsome and Ferocious 341 of 388
Epictetus — The Slave

The wise and good person doesn't pick fights with anyone. And as much as possible, he doesn't let others fight either. Socrates gives us a perfect example of this and everything else we should do. He avoided quarrels at every turn. But he also stopped other people from quarreling. Look at Xenophon's Symposium — see how many fights he settled. See how he put up with Thrasymachus and Polus and Callicles. See how he tolerated his wife and his son, even when his son tried to prove him wrong and nitpick with him. Socrates understood something important: you can't control another person's mind. So he only wanted what was actually his to control. And what is that? Not whether this person or that person acts according to their nature — that belongs to them, not you.

Discourses, Against the Quarrelsome and Ferocious 340 of 388
Freedom & Control Human Nature
Epictetus — The Slave Original

The wise and good man neither himself fights with any person, nor does he allow another, so far as he can prevent it. And an example of this as well as of all other things is proposed to us in the life of Socrates, who not only himself on all occasions avoided fights (quarrels), but would not allow even others to quarrel. See in Xenophon's Symposium how many quarrels he settled, how further he endured Thrasymachus and Polus and Callicles; how he tolerated his wife, and how he tolerated his son who attempted to confute him and to cavil with him. For he remembered well that no man has in his power another man's ruling principle. He wished therefore for nothing else than that which was his own. And what is this? Not that this or that man may act according to nature, for that is a thing which belongs to another;

Discourses, Against the Quarrelsome and Ferocious 340 of 388
‹ Previous Next ›

Ancient philosophy, in plain English.

About · Support