This was how Socrates lived. This is why his expression never changed. But we choose to practice and study everything except what would make us free and unblocked. You say: "Philosophers talk in riddles." But don't other fields have riddles too? What's more backwards than cutting someone's eye to help them see? If you told this to someone who knew nothing about surgery, wouldn't they laugh at you? So why be surprised that in philosophy, many true things sound backwards to beginners?
This was the practice of Socrates; this was the reason why he always had one face. But we choose to practise and study anything rather than the means by which we shall be unimpeded and free. You say: "Philosophers talk paradoxes." But are there no paradoxes in the other arts? And what is more paradoxical than to puncture a man's eye in order that he may see? If any one said this to a man ignorant of the surgical art, would he not ridicule the speaker? Where is the wonder, then, if in philosophy also many things which are true appear paradoxical to the inexperienced?