Plain
Epictetus — The Slave

Here's why this happens. We're born with nature already teaching us some basic ideas about right and wrong. But then we add our own arrogance to the mix. Someone says, 'Why don't I know what's beautiful and what's ugly? Don't I have the basic concept?' Yes, you do. 'Don't I apply it to specific situations?' Yes, you do. 'Don't I apply it correctly?' That's the whole problem right there. That's where conceit comes in. People start with these basic ideas that everyone agrees on. But then they move to controversial topics by applying these ideas poorly. If they could apply them correctly on top of having the basic concepts, what would stop them from being perfect?

Discourses, What the Beginning of Philosophy is 138 of 388
Knowing Yourself Human Nature
Epictetus — The Slave Original

And the cause of this is that we come into the world already taught as it were by nature some things on this matter ([Greek: topon]), and proceeding from these we have added to them self-conceit ([Greek: oiaesin]). For why, a man says, do I not know the beautiful and the ugly? Have I not the notion of it? You have. Do I not adapt it to particulars? You do. Do I not then adapt it properly? In that lies the whole question; and conceit is added here; for beginning from these things which are admitted men proceed to that which is matter of dispute by means of unsuitable adaptation; for if they possessed this power of adaptation in addition to those things, what would hinder them from being perfect?

Discourses, What the Beginning of Philosophy is 138 of 388
Epictetus — The Slave

But what about good and evil? What about beautiful and ugly? What about right and wrong behavior? What about happiness and misfortune? What about proper and improper conduct? What about what we should and shouldn't do? Who comes into the world without having a natural sense of these things? That's why we all use these words. We try to match our built-in ideas to specific situations: "He did the right thing." "He did the wrong thing." "He acted properly." "He didn't act properly." "He got unlucky." "He got lucky." "He's unfair." "He's fair." Who doesn't use these words? Who waits to learn them first, the way we wait to learn about geometry or music?

Discourses, What the Beginning of Philosophy is 137 of 388
Human Nature Knowing Yourself
Epictetus — The Slave Original

But as to good and evil, and beautiful and ugly, and becoming and unbecoming, and happiness and misfortune, and proper and improper, and what we ought to do and what we ought not to do, who ever came into the world without having an innate idea of them? Wherefore we all use these names, and we endeavor to fit the preconceptions to the several cases (things) thus: he has done well; he has not done well; he has done as he ought, not as he ought; he has been unfortunate, he has been fortunate; he is unjust, he is just; who does not use these names? who among us defers the use of them till he has learned them, as he defers the use of the words about lines (geometrical figures) or sounds?

Discourses, What the Beginning of Philosophy is 137 of 388
‹ Previous Next ›

Ancient philosophy, in plain English.

About · Support