Plain
Marcus Aurelius — The Emperor

For anything that is naturally good in you, we can set aside objections about that for now. Whatever is beautiful and good is so by its own nature. It doesn't need praise to complete it. Something that is praised doesn't become better or worse because of the praise. This applies even to things we commonly call beautiful and good - whether they're valued for their material or craftsmanship. As for what is truly good, what more does it need than justice or truth? What more than kindness and humility? Do any of these become good or beautiful because they're praised? Do they suffer damage when criticized? Does an emerald become worse if no one praises it? Does gold, ivory, or purple? Is there anything - even something as ordinary as a knife, a flower, or a tree - that changes because of what people say about it?

Meditations, Book 4, Section 16 Book 4 · 21 of 54
Knowing Yourself What Matters Most
Marcus Aurelius — The Emperor Original

For as for that, that it is the gift of nature, whatsoever is commended in thee, what might be objected from thence, let that now that we are upon another consideration be omitted as unseasonable. That which is fair and goodly, whatsoever it be, and in what respect soever it be, that it is fair and goodly, it is so of itself, and terminates in itself, not admitting praise as a part or member: that therefore which is praised, is not thereby made either better or worse. This I understand even of those things, that are commonly called fair and good, as those which are commended either for the matter itself, or for curious workmanship. As for that which is truly good, what can it stand in need of more than either justice or truth; or more than either kindness and modesty? Which of all those, either becomes good or fair, because commended; or dispraised suffers any damage? Doth the emerald become worse in itself, or more vile if it be not commended? Doth gold, or ivory, or purple? Is there anything that doth though never so common, as a knife, a flower, or a tree?

Meditations, Book 4, Section 16 Book 4 · 21 of 54
Marcus Aurelius — The Emperor

Someone who craves fame and wants to be remembered after death doesn't think this through. The people who remember him will soon die too. Then the people who come after them will also die. Eventually all memory of him will disappear completely. It has always worked this way — people admire someone, then die, then get replaced by others who also die.

But let's say the people who remember you could live forever, and your memory could last forever too. What good does that do you? I won't even ask what good it does after you're dead. What good does praise do you while you're still alive? The only use is for practical reasons — what we might call strategy or management.

Meditations, Book 4, Section 16 Book 4 · 20 of 54
Death & Mortality What Matters Most
Marcus Aurelius — The Emperor Original

He who is greedy of credit and reputation after his death, doth not consider, that they themselves by whom he is remembered, shall soon after every one of them be dead; and they likewise that succeed those; until at last all memory, which hitherto by the succession of men admiring and soon after dying hath had its course, be quite extinct. But suppose that both they that shall remember thee, and thy memory with them should be immortal, what is that to thee? I will not say to thee after thou art dead; but even to thee living, what is thy praise? But only for a secret and politic consideration, which we call οἰκονομίαν, or dispensation.

Meditations, Book 4, Section 16 Book 4 · 20 of 54
‹ Previous Next ›

Ancient philosophy, in plain English.

About · Support