If changing the patient's diet or portion sizes doesn't help, the doctor cuts some foods out entirely and reduces others. If that still doesn't work, he stops all food and makes the body fast. If gentler treatments fail, he opens a vein to let blood. If diseased limbs are poisoning the rest of the body, he cuts them off. None of this seems harsh if it saves the patient's life. In the same way, a judge or ruler should try to reform criminals with words first — gentle words, if possible. He should persuade them to do right, inspire them to love honor and justice, and make them hate vice while valuing virtue.
If neither alteration of the order or of the amount is of use, he cuts off some and reduces others. If even this does not answer, he forbids food, and disburdens the body by fasting. If milder remedies have proved useless he opens a vein; if the extremities are injuring the body and infecting it with disease he lays his hands upon the limbs; yet none of his treatment is considered harsh if its result is to give health. Similarly, it is the duty of the chief administrator of the laws, or the ruler of a state, to correct ill-disposed men, as long as he is able, with words, and even with gentle ones, that he may persuade them to do what they ought, inspire them with a love of honour and justice, and cause them to hate vice and set store upon virtue.