Reason is enough by itself not just to plan for the future, but to handle all our business. So what could be more foolish than for reason to ask anger for protection? Why would something certain ask help from something uncertain? Why would something trustworthy rely on something faithless? Why would something healthy depend on something sick? The truth is, reason is far more powerful on its own, even when doing things where anger seems most useful. When reason decides something should be done, it sticks with it. It can't find anything better than itself to trade places with.
Reason suffices by itself not merely to take thought for the future, but to manage our affairs:[8] what, then, can be more foolish than for reason to beg anger for protection, that is, for what is certain to beg of what is uncertain? what is trustworthy of what is faithless? what is whole of what is sick? What, indeed? since reason is far more powerful by itself even in performing those operations in which the help of anger seems especially needful: for when reason has decided that a particular thing should be done, she perseveres in doing it; not being able to find anything better than herself to exchange with.