Alexander trusted his friend more. He believed his friend deserved to be innocent, and that his actions should prove his innocence. I admire Alexander even more for this because he was naturally quick to anger. But when kings show restraint, it's especially rare and praiseworthy. The great Julius Caesar did something similar. During the civil war, he proved to be a merciful winner. He burned a bundle of letters that had been sent to Pompey by people who were thought to be neutral or on the opposing side. Caesar was never violent in his anger, but he chose to make it impossible for himself to get angry. He thought the kindest way to forgive each person was simply not to know what they had done wrong.
He felt more confidence in his friend: he deserved that his friend should be innocent, and deserved that his conduct should make him innocent. I praise Alexander’s doing this all the more because he was above all men prone to anger; but the rarer moderation is among kings, the more it deserves to be praised. The great Gaius Caesar, who proved such a merciful conqueror in the civil war, did the same thing; he burned a packet of letters addressed to Gnaeus Pompeius by persons who had been thought to be either neutrals or on the other side. Though he was never violent in his anger, yet he preferred to put it out of his power to be angry: he thought that the kindest way to pardon each of them was not to know what his offence had been.