You say, "I can't stand it. Injuries are too hard to bear." But that's not true. If you can bear being angry, how can you not bear the injury itself? Think about what you're actually doing — you're choosing to endure both the injury AND the anger. Why do you put up with a sick person's wild talk? Or a crazy person's ranting? Or when a child hits you? Because they don't know what they're doing. If someone isn't responsible for their actions, does it really matter what made them that way? The excuse of ignorance works the same in every case.
You say, “I cannot endure it: injuries are hard to bear.” You lie; for how can any one not be able to bear injury, if he can bear to be angry? Besides, what you intend to do is to endure both injury and anger. Why do you bear with the delirium of a sick man, or the ravings of a madman, or the impudent blows of a child? Because, of course, they evidently do not know what they are doing: if a man be not responsible for his actions, what does it matter by what malady he became so: the plea of ignorance holds equally good in every case.